Unemployment and Welfare

This essay bequeath let you know the different opinions of national policy issues involving welfare create conflicting debates between national, state, and local government and how these conflicting issues relate to federal official officialism. Federalism is A government system where power and authority are shared by national and states governments, with the ultimate authority derived from the mess.With that been said this essay will besides describe the history of TANF and discuss debates somewhat the pros and cons of TANF Temporary Assistance to free Families and the problems they are in worked to solve or better and the effectiveness of them both. (Levin-Waldman, 2012). When batch think about welfare they normally think of Medicaid, WIA Work investing Act, WIC Women, Infants, and Children and of course AFDC Aid to Families with Dependent Children now TANF, and HUD Housing and Urban Development.They tend to view it as the federal government giving away the countries bull ion and the taxpayers hard-earned dollars to people who cannot support themselves. Majority of people do not like the idea regardless of what and some are sympathetic to the pathetic and think you should help if you can and are financially stable. They may approve why they cannot support themselves, why do not they work or go to school, why they are having children they cannot take care of. These reasons are among former(a) things are how people see and view welfare in at onces golf club no matter what.The reasons could vary from a someone that lost a spouse, or they could have been laid off or fired from their jobs, or maybe their hours were decreased as there could be many other reasons, but there are programs to help people get back on their feet for example, training seminars, workshops, help with schooling and purpose jobs as well as day care assistance, nutritional programs, conclusion housing and other needs. The welfare reform debate has remained very emotional, becau se it touches on the most sensitive of societal issues work, family, sex, abortion, individualized responsibility, and community integrity. welfare reform has obtain a very important topic in todays world from fundamental questions about quality of life and how to allocate personal and public responsibilities. We are not sure as a society whether economic security for children is more important than providing clear consequences to parents who fail to take by the rules. We argue whether individual that are not responsible or societal barriers are at the root of welfare dependency.Temporary Assistance for poverty-stricken Families (TANF), the nations cash assistance program for poor families with children, has not played very much of a countercyclical role during the current recession. As unemployment has mount upn, TANF caseloads nationally have bountiful much more slowly and state TANF caseloads have not track state unemployment growth. Program rules and financing structures l imit the responsiveness of TANF in a downturn. As TANF reauthorization is considered, this brief details some relatively small changes that could improve the programs effectiveness in future recessions (Welfare Reform Act of 2011).Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC), the spot program of welfare in the United States and the focal point of discussions about reform, was terminated in 1996 with the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity satisfaction Act of 1996. This legislation effectively replaced AFDC, Emergency Assistance, and the JOBS programand the open-ended federal appropriations that supported themwith the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) block grant. In effect, the federal government began turning responsibility for welfare back to the states.Pros- Welfare has the turn a profit of providing much-needed food, medical care and money to citizens who qualify to receive it. Since taxes fund welfare, it redistributes riches across the population. W elfare also prevents even further social problems by allowing some recipients to maintain their standard of living. For example, unemployed workers who receive an unemployment benefit may be able to keep their homes despite the loss of income, preventing a foreclosure and manageable homelessness.Cons- The biggest disadvantage of welfare is its cost to the local governments that administer it. Even with federal funding, states feel the burden of welfare in each annual budget. Welfare may encourage some recipients not to seek work, since a rise in income would disqualify them from receiving free benefits. It is also an opportunity for fraud, which occurs whenever someone supplies inconclusive information to receive welfare benefits without truly qualifying