Carl Jung’s the Shadow Essay

The succeeding(a) assessment explores my understanding of how I apply the person-centred approach/ total conditions to myself when considering my tincture. To dish explore and deepen our understanding of Carl Jungs term the dark the variance this week carried out an exercise whereby we each chose a card show a negative/challenging personality trait. The card I chose was The Miser. We thence individually explored how we considered this aspect to play a recrudesce in our specter and how the shadow impacts on us personally and professionally. I will go on to describe what I disc everywhereed about my shadow during this exercise.The shadow represents the unconscious parts of our personality the parts our conscious-self disowns due to inner conflicts oft originating from foundations such as culture and upbringing. Refusing to acknowledge its existence and place at heart our psyche threatens to distort our bloods with ourselves and others. Embracing the shadow allows us to mov e deeper within our unconscious layers and develop a better understanding of self. According to Carl Jung, recognising our shadow material is part of the journey to embracing the totality of ourselves. However, this stomach represent to be a difficult task.As Jung notes, it takes consider fit moral effort, insight, and close will to embrace the dark aspects of our personality. Some parts of the shadow can be recognised more easily than others but because the shadow is a moral problem, there is usually some resistance to confronting it. 3a) generate the person-centred approach to self When thinking about the definition of The Miser, I initially was not sure about its true meaning. After questioning this I discovered it describes a miserable, penny pinching causa. On expanding on this and relating it to my shadow, I verbalized my own connection of this to selfishness leading on to false guilt.So how do I apply the core conditions to myself when experiencing these elements of my shadow? And how can I carry to a deeper and more compassionate understanding of these behaviours? A miserly character conjures up, from my personal vantage point, an image of Scrooge someone who takes no amusement in spending money on other people or making gestures of generosity. It is not a trait I would claim to wear as I genuinely enjoy organism as disinterested as I realistically within my network of family and friends. But, looking at this from a societal perspective, I can link feelings of selfishness to admitting that I could give more money to charity.In the economy we live in, speaking in broad terms, we all urgency to be cargonful about how and where we admit to spend our money. I would class myself as an trusty, hard-working, tax paying citizen making up part of the working class structure of society. I am however aware of times when I am frugal with my finance and the sense of guilt that can surface. When thinking of my shadow in the background of the core conditions, I can empathically understand that money is an integral part of my survival system to having the lifestyle, health, necessities and luxuries I choose to strive for.I can feel very sad for people and countries in desperate need of charitable help which is accompanied by a sense of selfishness over the advantages and privileges I fortunately fork out and whilst I feel passionate that nonentity should ever have to live a life of poverty in such a wealthy world, I remain realistic and appropriate with myself about the extent of which I am able to help financially. I take the time to acknowledge such issues but manage and ascribe them to a degree that does not defeat my sense of contribution to the world. This flows in to unconditional positive regard.I recognise that the feelings of selfishness and false guilt that turn up in me are hard to process and if I am honest that I am capable of feeling selfish, I can straggle to understand with more clarity the reasons to ho w I arrived at that place and at last feel respect and compassion for myself through a clearer understanding and appreciation. 3b) critically examine how this application impacts on your own counselling So how does thinking about my shadow relate to me professionally? Not owning my shadow as a counsellor could exert an unseen influence on my descent with the client.To abandon such parts of myself is to supress them and inevitably and unconsciously permit them run in to the dynamics of the relationship. If I strive to use the core conditions with myself, and stand myself spiritualistly and compassionately, I will be capable of providing the same conditions for the client. Rogers (1961) describes push the relevance of being congruentThe psychotherapist is what he is, when in the relationship with his client he is genuine and without front or facade, openly being the feelings and attitudes which at that moment are flowing in himthe feelings the therapist is experiencing are avail able to him, available to his awareness, and he is able to live these feelings, be them, and able to communicate them if appropriate. As a counsellor I need to have the ability to own my flaws and admit that I am human and excellent but strive to internally construct them in a sensitive way so as not to allow them to sabotage the delicate conditions in which a therapeutic relationship can develop.Disavowing the conflicts and flaws within me could impression in projecting my own value systems, beliefs and insecurities on to the client. If I were to deny the ability within me to feel selfish then my visceral reaction to a client bringing up such issues in a session would be stuck inside my own frame of reference and the core conditions I aim to provide myself and the client would be blinkered. References Rogers C, . (1961) On fit a Person A Therapists View of Psychotherapy. London. Constable.